High CourtsDivision Bench(2016) 04 PAT CK 0138

State of Bihar vs Mostt. Jeenat Khatoon

Patna High Court · Decided on 18 April 2016 · Citation: (2016) 3 PLJR 863

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mr. Hemant Gupta and Mr. Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ.
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Review No. 247 of 2014 with I.A. Nos. 6644 of 2014 and 2983 of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 277 words

Mr. Hemant Gupta, J.(Oral)—The application is for condonation of delay of 164 days in filing of the Civil Review Application.

2.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, we are satisfied that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay of 164 days in filing of the present Civil Review Application. Consequently, the delay is condoned.

3.

Interlocutory Application stands disposed of accordingly.

Civil Review No. 247 of 2014

4.

The present Civil Review Application is for review of the order dated 13th May 2014, whereby the Division Bench has not interfered with grant of compensation of Rs. 3,50,000/- to the respondent on account of electrocution consequent to snapping of 11,000 K.V. Transmission Line.

5.

The argument raised by the appellants is that in terms of the policy decision, the Electricity Board has decided to pay ex gratia compensation of Rs. 2 lacs, whereas the Court has granted compensation of Rs. 3,50,000/-.

6.

We do not find that any decision of the Electricity Board to grant ex gratia compensation of Rs. 2 lacs can bar the Court to award a suitable amount of compensation on account of proved negligence on behalf of the Electricity Board. Admittedly, 11,000 K.V. live Transmission Line was lying on the ground when the deceased came in contact with the said live wire when he went to the field to answer the call of nature.

7.

The mere fact that the wire was live even after snapping shows negligence of the Electricity Board. Therefore, we do not find any error apparent on record which may warrant interference in the order passed by the Division Bench.

8.

The Civil Review Application stands dismissed.