High CourtsDivision Bench(1999) 06 AP CK 0004

State of A.P. vs Prakash Industries

Andhra Pradesh High Court · Decided on 15 June 1999 · Citation: (2000) 118 STC 378

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.V. Maruthi, J · S. Ananda Reddy, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Tax Revision Case No. 60 of 1991

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 209 words

S.V. Maruthi, J.—The issue involved in this tax revision case is whether the cast iron castings fall under entry 2 of the Third Schedule and therefore not liable to pay tax once again when they are manufactured from pig iron and cast iron scrap. Entry 2(1) of the Third Schedule reads as pig iron and cast iron including ingot, moulds, bottom plates. If cast iron castings fall under this entry and manufactured from the raw material falling under this entry this cast iron castings are not liable to be taxed once again. In this context the clarification issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh is relevant. The Government of Andhra Pradesh by G.O. Ms. No. 383, Revenue, dated April 17, 1985 clarified that cast iron castings are covered within the term cast iron. Though the cast iron castings are manufactured from pig iron and scrap since it is clarified that cast iron castings fall under item cast iron and since the raw material has already suffered tax the cast iron castings are not liable to be taxed once again as they fall under the same entry of the Third Schedule.

2.

In view of the above, we agree with the Tribunal and dismiss the tax revision case. No costs.