Privy Council(1891) 02 PRI CK 0007

Srimantu Raja Yarlagaddu Durga vs Srimantu Mallikarjuna

Privy Council · Decided on 28 February 1891 · Citation: (1891) 14 ILRPC 439

HON’BLE JUDGES
Watson, Hobhouse, Macnaghten, Morris, R. Couch, JJ.

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 89 words
1.

Lord Watson in giving judgment said that their Lordships had come to the conclusion that, so far as the petition referred to the production of new evidence and a rehearing of the case on the merits, the application was altogether incompetent. So far as regarded the other point there was a difference; but, looking to the small amount involved, they would not be warranted in recommending Her Majesty in Council to remit this case for a rehearing. Under the circumstances they would make no order as to costs.