Privy Council(1933) 01 PRI CK 0010

(Thotapalli Sarvabhotla) Venkata Chandikamba vs Indrakanti Viswanathamayya

Privy Council · Decided on 27 January 1933 · Citation: (1933) AIR(PC) 117

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinshah Mulla, George Lowndes, Lord Thankerton, JJ.
CASE NUMBER
Privy Council Appeal No. 48 of 1931

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 159 words

Lord Thankerton

The one point which is sought to be raised in this appeal by the appellant, who was plaintiff in the action, is a point which should, have been pleaded by him in his plaints and it has not been so pleaded. It has been pointed out that it required evidence to establish it, and no evidence has been called about it. It was not argued in the trial Judge''s Court, nor was it argued before the High Court at the hearing of the appeal and cross-objections. The first time it was raised was on the application for review of the judgment of the High Court. Their Lordships are clearly of opinion that it is quite impossible to allow the appellant to raise the point without any pleadings and without any evidence before this Board, and, they will humbly advise His Majesty that the appeal should be dismissed with costs and the decree of the High Court affirmed.