High CourtsSingle Bench(2002) 12 PAT CK 0074

Sri. Rajendra Prasad vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 12 December 2002 · Citation: (2003) 1 PLJR 438

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shiva Kirti Singh, J
CASE NUMBER
C.W.J.C. No. 7273 of 2000

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 280 words

Shiva Kirti Singh, J.—Heard the parties.

2.

The Petitioner retired on 31st January, 1993 from the post of Sanitary Inspector of Ghanshyampur blow in the district of Darbhanga. He has not been paid the proceeds of G.P.F. till date mainly because certain discrepancies arose in respect of G.P.F. account number. That has been resolved and the balance figures were sent by A.G. Bihar in the year 2000. The Petitioner objected to the balance figures and pointed out certain discrepancies and filed documents to support his claim. The office of A.G. Bihar forwarded the objection of the Petitioner along with copies of documents through letter bearing No. 1986 dated 18.12.2001 to the District Provident Fund Officer, Darbhanga. However, counter affidavit filed on behalf of the District Provident Fund Officer, Respondent- No. 4, is of the year 2000 and does not disclose what action has been taken on the basis of the Petitioner''s objection communicated through A.G. Bihar in December, 2001.

3.

The Petitioner retired long back and now when all the materials are available with Respondent No. 4 at least since December, 2001, Respondent No. 4 must take final decision in respect of Petitioner''s claim for proceeds of G.P.F. along with statutory interest at the earliest and in any case within a period of six weeks from the date of production/communication of a copy of this order.

4.

Let a copy of this order be given to learned Counsel for the Petitioner as well learned Counsel for the State.

5.

Let this matter be listed after eight weeks under the same heading and by that date, the final decision taken by the Respondent No. 4 should be brought on the record.