High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 02 KAR CK 0037

SRI. BALARAJU S vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 1 February 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.S.Bopanna
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
4524-4584 of 2018 (GM-Res)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 444 words
1.

Learned Government Advocate, to accept notice for respondents No.1 and 2 and file memo of appearance in four weeks.

2.

The petitioners are before this Court seeking issue of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 17.01.2018 at

Annexures ''E1'' to ''E60'' for issue of Hakkupatra.

3.

Though several contentions are urged in the instant petition, the same need not be adverted to in detail inasmuch as, when similarly placed

persons were before this Court in W.P. Nos.9417-9451/2016, this Court through the order dated 03.03.2016 on taking note of the aspects

which is similar to the contentions herein, has arrived at the conclusion as hereunder:

4.

Having taken note of the contentions that have been raised in the petitions and also the representations made to the 2nd respondent, it would

indicate that several factual aspects are to be taken into consideration and thereafter the decision is to be taken by the 2nd respondent in

accordance with law. Therefore, no opinion with regard to the right of the petitioners can be adjudicated in these petitions. All that could be done

is to direct the 2nd respondent to taken note of the representation filed by the petitioners, to verify all records and thereafter take a decision in the

matter in accordance with law.

5.

To enable such consideration, each of the petitioners shall now file one more copy of the representations along with the supporting documents

with the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent on receipt of the same shall take a decision in the matter in accordance with law and convey the

same to the petitioners. Such decision in any event shall be taken in an expeditious manner, but not later than three months from the date on which

a copy of this order is furnished. Needless to mention that if the decision is in favour of the petitioners, the further proceedings in that regard shall

also be taken.

4.

In that view, a similar consideration is required to be made in these petitions also. Hence, the petitioners herein also are granted the liberty of

filing one more copy of the representation along with the supporting documents with respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 on receipt of the same

shall take a decision in the matter in accordance with law and convey the same to the petitioner. Such decision in any event shall be taken in an

expeditious manner but not later than three months from the date on which a copy of this order is furnished.

Needless to mention that if the decision is in favour of the petitioners, the further proceedings in that regard shall also be taken.

Petition is accordingly disposed of.