High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 09 SHI CK 0015

Sonu Kaushal vs Himachal Pradesh Gramin

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 7 September 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Chitkara, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (Main) No. 429 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 224 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

1.

This petition coming on for admission this day, the Court passed the following:

2.

I have heard Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Ms. Devyani Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent-Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank.

3.

Ms. Devyani Sharma, learned counsel for the Bank, has opposed this petition on various grounds, including non-filing of the impugned order. She has also argued that on merits, this petition cannot be entertained because the only proceedings the bank has initiated, at this stage, is recovery of compensation in accordance with law.

4.

Given above, I am of the considered view that instead of deciding this petition on merits, the purpose would be served, in case petitioner is afforded some reasonable time to comply with the orders.

5.

Learned counsel for the Bank has opposed this request. However, given the COVID-19 Pandemic, financial problems are being faced by the people, as such, this Court turns down the objection of the respondent-Bank and extends the time to deposit the compensation amount as ordered by the concerned Court. Let compensation amount be deposited by 10th January, 2022.

6.

With the aforesaid direction, the present petition is closed. The proceedings pending before the concerned Court shall be subject to this order. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of in the above terms.

Copy dasti.