High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 03 JH CK 0107

SMT. MAYA KISKU vs BIMLA KISKU

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 28 March 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) No.1643 of 2008

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 186 words
1.

Aggrieved of order dated 09.01.2008 passed in Execution Suit No.04 of 1995 whereby application under section 47 C.P.C has been dismissed, the

petitioner-judgment debtor has approached this Court.

2.

Without recording detail facts of the case, suffice would be to indicate that against an order passed under section 47 C.P.C on 04.06.2005 the

petitioner came to this Court in W.P.(C) No.3689 of 2005. The writ petition stood disposed of with a direction to the executing court to execute the

decree in accordance with law. The judgment debtor again filed an application on 04.10.2007 which has been dismissed by the impugned order dated

09.01.2008.

This was also an application under section 47 C.P.C.

3.

Pursuant to order dated 19.07.2017, a report from the trial court has been received. It is stated that the case is pending for the report of survey

knowing Pleader Commissioner in respect of measurement of the decreetal property. In this view of the matter grievance raised by the petitioner in

this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. The executing court shall execute the decree, expeditiously.

4.

The writ petition stands disposed of.