High CourtsDIVISION BENCH(2017) 05 RAJ CK 0073

Smt. Manita Bishnoi W/o Vishnu Kumar vs Vishnu Kumar S/o Shri Raja Ram

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 17 May 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Govind Mathur, Manoj Kumar Garg
CASE NUMBER
1247 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 364 words
1.

This appeal is barred by limitation from 16 days. Having considered all facts of the case and also taking into consideration that the respondent is having no objection, if the delay caused in filing the appeal be condoned. We deem it appropriate to accept the application preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, accordingly the same is allowed. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

2.

By order dated 10.03.2017, the Family Court, Sriganganagar, dismissed the application preferred by the appellant under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by arriving at conclusion that the appellate failed to establish cruelity as well as desertion on part of respondent Shri Vishnu Kumar.

3.

In pursuance to order dated 10.03.2017, the appellant as well as the respondent are present in person. On asking the appellant as well as the respondent submits with all confidence that they have entered into compromise and that demands to annule marriage between them, that was solemnized on

17.11.2011.

4.

It is further submitted that, in view of the fact that the application under Section 13 of the Act, 1955 was filed long back on 24.02.2015 adequate cooling period has already been passed.

5.

The parties asserted that they have entered into the compromise with all seriousness and after taking into consideration all pros and cons of that.

6.

The original compromise is also placed on record containts of that reads as follows:-

"VERNACULAR MATTER OMITTED"

7.

Having considered the averments contained in the compromise and also the facts brought to the knowledge of Court, just to meet the ends of justice, and also taking into consideration peculiar facts of the case. We deem it appropriate to accept the instant appeal.

8.

Accordingly, the same is allowed. The judgment and decree on 10.03.2017, passed by Family Court, Sriganganagar in Civil

Misc. Case No.261/2016 is set aside. The application preferred by the appellant Smt. Manita Bishnoi, under Section 13 of the Act, 1955 is allowed. The marriage solemnized between the parties on 07.11.2011 is annulled in the terms of the compromise arrived between the parties. A decree be prepared in the same terms.

9.

No order as to costs.