Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 02 TDSAT CK 0064

Siti Networks Ltd vs Om Mehtab Vision And Anr

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 16 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shiva Kirti Singh, Chairperson · Subodh Kumar Gupta, Member
CASE NUMBER
Broadcasting Petition Nos. 777, 778, 779 Of 2020 With Misc Application 93, 94, 95 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 208 words

Heard learned counsel for the respondents. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that as indicated during the last hearing

he is not getting any instructions in the matter from respondent no. 1. He submits that he shall file reply/appropriate application on behalf of respondent

no. 2 within three weeks.

 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the talks for settlement has reached final stage, the respondents have not come forward to

execute the settlement agreement and, therefore, the petitions will have to be considered on merits. She prays for time to file rejoinder to the reply

of respondent no. 1 and, if required, to the rely/application of respondent no. 2 if filed within time. Petitioner may file rejoinder to the reply of the

respondent or a reply to the application of respondent no. 2 within five weeks from today.

Petitioner has pressed M.A. Nos. 93 to 95 of 2021 filed under Section 20 of the TRAI Act for action against the respondents. If so advised,

respondents may file reply to the aforesaid M.As. within three weeks. Rejoinder, if required, may be filed before the next date when the M.As.

shall also be considered.

Post the matter under the same head on 30.3.2022..