High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 04 TP CK 0046

Shilpi Das & Anr. vs State Of Tripura & 2 Ors.

Tripura High Court · Decided on 16 April 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arindam Lodh, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) 773 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

27 paragraphs · 245 words

Arindam Lodh, J

Mr. S. Dey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that the reliefs claimed for in the writ petition have already been granted to the petitioners and in this respect, the Memorandum dated 04.03.2024, issued by the Branch Officer, Directorate of Secondary Education, Tripura has been placed before this Court, which reads as under:

“No.F.3(C-49)-SE-E (Cont.)2020(L-I)/19

Government of Tripura,

Directorate of Secondary Education,

Estt.(Confirmation) Section.

Dated, Agartala the 04/03/2024

MEMO

Sub: Legal Notice for the benefit of MACP-1 in terms of Rule-12 of TSCS(RP),2017

As per Judgment & order dated 22.08.2023 of the Hon’ble High Court of Tripura in WP(C) No.146 of 2022, the following legal Notice givers are entitled for the benefit of MACP-1 on completion of 10 years of service in terms of Rule 12 of the TSCS(RP),2017.

Sl. No

Name of the incumbents & Address

Date of appointment as PGT

Date of appointment as GT

1.

Smt. Shilpi Das, W/o Sri Abhijit Saha, Netaji Pally, Belonia, South Tripura, 799155

26.08.2010

27.12.2017

2.

Sri Bijoy Sharma, S/o Hiralal Sharma, Gopinagar, Kalkalia, Bishalgarh, Sepahijala, 799102

26.08.2010

28.12.2017

Hence, she is requested to send the representation0 through H/O & DDO properly along with prescribed format & related documents for taking next course of action from this end.

Branch Officer,

Directorate of Secondary Education,

Tripura.”

In view of the Memo dated 04.03.2024 as quoted here-in-above, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners does not press this writ petition. Accordingly the same stands dismissed.