High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 01 PAT CK 0028

Sheikh Arif @ Md. Arif vs State Of Bihar And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 7 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, CJ · Anjani Kumar Sharan, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1068 Of 2014, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21758 Of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 294 words

The present appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 16.05.2014 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 21758 of

2012, titled as Ghulam Md. Jeelani Ashraf Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.

The challenge laid in the present appeal is limited to the observations made against the present appellant who was party-respondent in the writ petition,

on the ground that the present appellant was never noticed, and as such, the observations made are without affording opportunity of hearing.

We are in agreement with such submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant but that would not mean that the judgment needs to be

interfered with on that count, for the process of selection and appointment cannot be held to be illegal in any manner.

As such, we are not inclined to set aside that part of the order whereby direction stands issued for initiating departmental proceeding against the

appellant. In fact, we are of the considered view that such proceedings be initiated against all such persons who were involved in the process of

selection and appointment.

As such, we dispose of the present appeal clarifying that the observations made in the impugned judgment in so far as it relates to the act and conduct

of the present appellant are concerned, shall not come in the way of the conclusion of the proceedings.

Needless to add, the departmental proceedings shall be conducted and concluded within a time bound period. Since the matter relates to the year 2012,

we direct that the said proceedings be concluded within a period of six months, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties.

The present appeal stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.