High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 05 J&K CK 0001

Shashi Parihar and others vs State and others

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 31 May 2017 · Citation: 2017 0 LabIC 3533

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Aradhe
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
2216 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

30 paragraphs · 246 words

Matric with Science,:,40 Points,,,,,

10+2,:,05 Points,,,,,

Graduation,:,10 Points,,,,,

Diploma,:,15 Points,,,,,

Post Graduation,:,10 Points,,,,,

Viva,:,20 Points,,,,,

Total,:,100 Points,,,,,

IV,A,"Stock Assistant/Jr.

Lab. Asstt./Jr.

Grader/Rukh",Overseer.,410-700,Matric with Science,"40% by promotion

from Class VI category

A subject to the

condition that the

promottee is a matric

with science and has

2 years experience in

that class","60 % by direct

recruitment

Matric with

Science.

15.

In view of preceding analysis, I do not find any merit in the writ petitions. The appointment of the private respondents whose names were",,,,,,,

included in the final select list was stayed on account of interim orders passed by this Court, as a result of which they were deprived of their right to",,,,,,,

seek appointment. It is well settled in law that on account of an order passed by the Court, nobody should suffer prejudice, therefore, I deem it",,,,,,,

appropriate to direct that private respondents whose names appear in the final select list shall be given appointment with retrospective effect, that",,,,,,,

is, the date from which their names were included in the final merit list. However, the aforesaid benefit shall only be for the limited purpose of",,,,,,,

seniority and pension and the private respondents shall not be entitled to any monetary benefits. With the aforesaid directions, the petitions are",,,,,,,

disposed of.,,,,,,,

Contempt (SWP) No.189/2011:,,,,,,,

In view of order of dismissal of the writ petition, namely, SWP No.2198/2010 passed today, no orders are required to be passed in this contempt",,,,,,,

petition. The same is, accordingly, closed. Petition dismissed.",,,,,,,