Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2026) 09 DRAT CK 6088

Sharadkumar Bhupatbhai Dobariya & Ors. vs The Authorised Officer, Bandhan Bank

Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai · Decided on 24 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vivek Bharti Sharma, Chairperson
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
M.A. No. 56/2026 (Refund of Deposit) In (Regular Appeal Diary No. 1294/2026-Dismissed); M.A. No. 53/2026 (Refund of Deposit) In (Regular Appeal Diary No. 1295/2026-Dismissed); M.A. No. 55/2026 (Refund of Deposit) In (Regular Appeal Diary No. 1296/2026-Dismissed)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 140 words
1.

Present as under: Ms. Sandhya Sondhi, Counsel for Applicants/Borrowers. Mr. Akash Acharya, Counsel for Respondent Bank appeared through VC.

2.

The matter is taken up for hearing by way of praecipe filed by the Applicants/Borrowers for seeking urgent relief.

3.

The Learned Counsel for the Applicants/Borrowers would submit that M.A. Nos. 53/2026, 55/2026 and 56/2026 have been filed seeking refund of the pre-deposit amounts lying with the Registry, DRAT, Mumbai.

She would further submit that the present appeals have been dismissed. Therefore, seeks refund of the pre-deposit amounts.

4.

Not objected to by the Respondent Bank.

5.

Accordingly, M.A. Nos. 53/2026, 55/2026 and 56/2026 are allowed. The Registry is directed to refund the respective pre-deposit amounts with accrued interest, if any, to Applicant No.1 as prayed for in the applications.

6.

All pending, I. As if any, stand dismissed.