High CourtsSingle Bench(2009) 10 J&K CK 0021

Sewa Singh and Others vs State and Others

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 20 October 2009 · Citation: (2010) 1 JKJ 172

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Hali, J
RESULT
Allowed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 372 words

Sunil Hali, J.—On the complaint filed by one Gunwant Singh-respondent No. 3 herein, alleging therein that the petitioners assaulted and

threatened to kill him, an FIR u/s 107/117 of the Code of Criminal Procedure came to be lodged in police station Gandhi Nagar, Jammu, against

the present petitioners. The said complaint has been presented before the learned Executive Magistrate, 1st Class, Jammu, by the SHO

concerned.

2.

Petitioners have filed the present petition u/s 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the FIR as also the proceedings initiated,

against them by the learned Executive Magistrate, 1st Class, Jammu.

3.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submit that the provisions of Section 107 of the Cr.P.C., are not applicable to the present case.

4.

It is stated that taking into consideration the allegations levelled against the petitioners, it could be a case of any other substantive offence but not

u/s 107/117 Cr.P.C..

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

5.

Section 107 of the Cr.P.C., is preventive in nature and is intended to maintain the peace and public tranquility in the area. If any person who

commits an act which results in disturbing the peace and public tranquility of an area, he can be bound down by directing him to execute a bond for

keeping the peace in the said area provided such an act is against the public at large. However, any act which has no result of disturbing the peace

of a particular area but is intended to cause harm to a particular person would not fall within the purview of Section 107 of the Cr.P.C..

6.

A perusal of the complaint in the present case shows that the allegations against the petitioners are that they assaulted the complainant and

threatened to kill him. The said act of the petitioners cannot be said to be an act which has resulted in disturbing the peace and public tranquility of

the area, and therefore, would not be covered by the provisions of Section 107 of the Cr.P.C..

7.

For the reasons mentioned above, this petition is allowed. The impugned complaint as also the proceedings initiated pursuant thereto by the

learned Executive Magistrate, 1st Class, against the petitioner shall stand quashed. Disposed of accordingly.