High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 10 JH CK 0021

Santosh Kumar Mehta @ Santosh Kumar and Anil Raj @ Anil Mehta vs State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 31 October 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dhrub Narayan Upadhyay, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
A.B.A. No. 3736 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 226 words

D.N. Upadhyay

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioners in connection with Barhi (Padma) PS case No. 49 of 2012 (GR No. 637/2012) for the offence registered under sections 143 / 341/ 342/ 186/ 332/ 353/ 504/ 283 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

It reveals from the FIR that the petitioners created road jaam against seizure of a tractor which was parked in their crusher.

3.

It is submitted that sections 353/ 332 IPC are not attracted and rest of the sections are bailable. No criminal force was used against public servants in discharge of their official duties. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering above facts and circumstances of the case, both the petitioners above named are directed to appear/surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks positively from the date of this order and on their surrender, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rajesh Kumar, J.M. 1st Class, Hazaribagh, in connection with Barhi (Padma) PS case No. 49 of 2012 (GR No. 637/2012), subject to the conditions laid down u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C.