High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 10 SHI CK 3236

Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. vs State Of H.P. & Ors.

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla · Decided on 26 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CWP No.18512 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 311 words

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Notice. Mr. Sikander Bhushan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2.

Petitioners feel aggrieved against order dated 15.05.2025 (Annexure P-7), whereby respondent No.2 has turned down their representation in view of “Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024”. They seek applicability of the decision rendered in Taj Mohammad and others Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others2.

3.

It is an admitted position that “Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024” has been quashed and set aside in Devinder Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr.3. It is also a matter of record that State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. Vs. Devinder Kumar & Ors.4 instituted by the State of Himachal Pradesh against the aforementioned judgment, has been dismissed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 29.07.2026. While dismissing the appeal, the Hon’ble Apex Court granted four months’ time to the State Government to do the needful in terms of the judgment.

4.

In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of by quashing the impugned order dated 15.05.2025 (Annexure P-7), with direction to the respondents to consider the respective cases of the petitioners afresh for grant of the relief prayed for by them, in accordance with the timeline indicated by the Hon’ble Apex Court. The petitioners are at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of their surviving grievances, if any, at an appropriate stage, in case necessity so arises in future. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Footnotes

  1. 1.Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
  2. 2.CWP No.2004 of 2017, decided alongwith connected matter on 03.08.2023.
  3. 3.CWP No.3361 of 2025, decided alongwith connected matters on 25.04.2026
  4. 4.Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).24885/2026