High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 10 SHI CK 0658

Nirvair Singh & Ors. vs State Of H.P. & Ors.

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla · Decided on 5 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 164/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 300 words

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J

Even though the reply has not been filed, however, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter has accordingly been heard at this stage.

2.

Petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to count their contract services for the purpose of annual increments, seniority, revision of pay, leave encashment, pensionary benefits, promotion and all other consequential benefits. They seek applicability of the decision rendered in Taj Mohammad and others Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others2.

2.

It is an admitted position that the “Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024” has been quashed and set aside in Devinder Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr3. It is also a matter of record that State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. Vs. Devinder Kumar & Ors.4 instituted by the State of Himachal Pradesh against the aforementioned judgment, has been dismissed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 29.07.2026. While dismissing the appeal, the Hon’ble Apex Court granted four months’ time to the State Government to do the needful in terms of the judgment.

In view of above, the present writ petition is disposed of at this stage with direction to the respondents to pass consideration order in accordance with the timeline indicated by the Hon’ble Apex Court. The petitioners are at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of their surviving grievances, if any, at an appropriate stage, in case necessity so arises. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Footnotes

  1. 1.Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
  2. 2.CWP No.2004 of 2017 decided alongwith connected matter on 03.08.2023.
  3. 3.CWP No. 3361 of 2025 decided alonwith connected matters on 25.04.2026
  4. 4.Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24885/2026 decided on 29.07.2026