High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 05 KL CK 0196

Sajeerudheen vs Director, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 25 May 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr Kauser Edappagath, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 366 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 219 words

Dr Kauser Edappagath, J

1.

This Writ Petition (Crl.) has been filed aggrieved by the delay in completing the investigation and filing the further report under Section 173(8) of Cr.P.C.

2.

On the basis of the complaint preferred by the petitioner, a crime was registered against three persons. The initial investigation revealed that no offence under PC Act was attracted and hence, a negative final report was filed before the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thiruvananthapuram. However, the special court directed further investigation. After conducting further investigation, a further report was filed, which was also returned. The learned special judge refused to accept the said final report and ordered further investigation again as per Ext.P4 order. According to the petitioner, thereafter, the 3rd respondent is not completing the further investigation. It is in these circumstances, he has approached this Court.

3.

The learned Special Public Prosecutor for VACB produced the copy of a report of the investigating officer. It is stated in the said report that further investigation is almost over and the further report is under preparation. In these circumstances, this Writ Petition (Crl.) is disposed of with a direction to the 3rd respondent to complete the investigation and file further report within a period of one month from today.

This Writ Petition (Crl.) is disposed of accordingly.