High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 08 MAD CK 0049

R.Ramamoorthy vs M.A.Rejaak And Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 16 August 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
J.Nisha Banu, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Revision Petition (MD) No. 1370 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 362 words

\

J.Nisha Banu, J

1.

This civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioner / 1st defendant seeking for a direction to the learned District Munsif, Pattukottai to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.11 of 2019 within a stipulated time.

2.According to the petitioner / 1st defendant, the 1st respondent / plaintiff has filed the suit in O.S.No.11 of 2019 for the reliefs of declaration, mandatory and permanent injunctions. The petitioner / 1st defendant has also filed his written statement. The Court below finding that since the market value of the suit property is above Rs.1,00,000/- and the Court below has no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the suit, has posted the suit under the caption 'for maintainability'. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the suit has been posted under the caption "for maintainability", the matter has been adjourned without any valid reason and therefore, he has filed this revision petition seeking a direction for early disposal of the suit.

3.Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner / 1st defendant would submit that since the Court below has posted the suit 'for maintainability', it would suffice if a direction is given to the Court below to decide the maintainability of the suit within a time frame.

4.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner / 1st defendant. In view of the limited relief sought for by the petitioner / 1st defendant, this Court is of the view that notice need not be sent to the respondents 1 and 2.

5.Considering fact that the suit has been posted for maintainability and also considering the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner / 1st defendant, this Court, without adverting to the merits of the case, is inclined to direct the Court below to decide the maintainability of the suit, on merits and in accordance with law after hearing both sides, as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Both the parties are directed to cooperate with the Court below.

6.Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.