High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 03 SHI CK 0154

Rohit Jaswal vs State of H.P.

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 10 March 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Surinder Singh, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal M.P. (M) No. 151 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 356 words

Surinder Singh, J.—Report filed. The matter heard and considered.

2.

As per report, a case under Sections 364, 342, 324, 323, 506 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code stands registered in terms of FIR No. 28/2010 dated 23.2.2010 in Police Station Gagret District Una, H.P.

3.

Precisely, the case of the prosecution is that Mohan Lal injured-complainant was security guard in the said Industry/factory. It is alleged that on 23.2.2010 at about 7.30 p.m., Petitioner along with his parents (co-accused) arrived at the gate of the Industry/Factory in a vehicle and asked about the whereabouts of owner of the industry/Factory and immediately thereafter father of the Petitioner caught hold of the complainant from his collar and started beatings him and dragged him to the National Highway, in which Petitioner also assisted. Many people gathered there. Raj Kumar co-accused, father of the Petitioner, alleged that the complainant had committed rape with his wife. Thereafter the gathering dispersed and Raj Kumar kept on beating the complainant and the complainant was confined in a room for about one hour. He also thrust the liquor bottle in the mouth of the complainant and was thereafter taken in the vehicle towards Mubarkpur to Talwara road and from there, he was pushed out from the vehicle.

4.

The role attributed to the Petitioner is only to the extent that he was accompanying his father Raj Kumar and also gave beatings to the complainant along with his father. As per the prosecution case, when the complainant was taken in the vehicle, he and his mother Sushma alighted from the vehicle and it was Petitioner Raj Kumar alone who had confined the complainant in the room and thereafter thrown him out, as aforesaid.

5.

Keeping in view the role attributed to Petitioner Rohit Jaswal and also the fact that he is apprehending his arrest in non-bailable offences, he has a case for bail, as such interim bail granted on 2.3.2010 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions and also on additional condition that the Petitioner shall not involve himself in any criminal activity in future.

6.

The petition stands disposed of.