High CourtsDivision Bench(2008) 05 PAT CK 0018

Rekha Narayan vs State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 19 May 2008 · Citation: (2008) 4 PLJR 477

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.M. Lodha, C.J · C.K. Prasad, J
CASE NUMBER
Cr.WJC No. 366 of 2008

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 182 words
1.

Rekha Narayan-petitioner has alleged in this habeas corpus petition that her daughter Priyanka Purnima alias Neeru has been kept in illegal confinement by Rajesh Kumar (respondent no. 5). She has prayed for production of her daughter Priyanka Purnima before the court and release from illegal confinement. Pursuant to the direction issued by this Court on 12th May, 2008, it transpires that the concerned police official was not able to produce her on 16th May, 2008. Today, Priyanka Purnima appears on her own. She is identified by Mr. Sunil Kumar, Inspector (Officer In-charge), Patliputra Police Station, Patna who is present in court.

2.

To our query, she stated that she was 25 years old and that she has been staying with respondent no. 5-Rajesh Kumar of her own free will and volition. She has denied any pressure by respondent no. 5 or that she has been illegally confined by him.

3.

In the circumstances, we find no merit in the writ petition. Priyanka Purnima is free to stay wherever she desires to. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition is disposed of.