High CourtsSingle Bench(1963) 03 AP CK 0005

Registrar of Companies vs Syed Jahangir

Andhra Pradesh High Court · Decided on 22 March 1963 · Citation: (1964) CriLJ 447

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sharfuddin Ahmed, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 170 words

Sharfuddin Ahmed, J.—The Vith City Magistrate has directed the return of the complaint as the offence has been committed three years ago I.e., in the year 1958. Against this, a revision was filed and the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Hyderabad has made, a reference for setting aside the order as in his opinion there is no provision in the Code try the return of the complaint.

2.

An offence under the Companies Act was committed for which a complaint was lodged by the Registrar of Companies. The learned Magistrate has passed the impugned order on the ground that the default was committed in 1958 and as such it was not tenable. There is no provision in the Companies Act which imposes any 1 limitation on the powers of the Registrar to file a complaint; even otherwise the return of the complaint is not; provided by the Criminal Procedure Code. The reference is accordingly accepted, setting aside the order of the Magistrate and directing the Magistrate to proceed according to law,