Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2026) 09 CAT CK 6787

Rashmi Tripathi vs The Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal, Lucknow · Decided on 8 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Ojha, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 332/00530/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 243 words

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Senior Central Government Standing Counsel for the respondents and perused the records.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that ends of justice would be served if a direction is given by this Tribunal to the respondents/competent authority to consider and dispose of the pending representation of the applicant dated 18/11/2025 (Annexure-6) in the light of (Annexure-3) dated 08.05.2024, which are annexed at page-14-18 of the OA by the respondents by way of reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period of time.

3.

To this, learned counsel for the respondents orally opposed, however, submitted that in case the applicant’s representation is directed to be decided in the manner suggested, if not decided yet then a period of at least two months may be allowed for the same.

4.

In view of the above submissions, the respondents/Competent authority is directed to consider and decide the pending representation of the applicant dated 18/11/2025 (Annexure-6), in the light of (Annexure-3) dated 08.05.2024, which are annexed at page-14-18 of the OA, preferred by the applicant, if not decided yet within a period of two months by passing a reasoned and speaking order as per law, under intimation forthwith to the applicant.

5.

It is made clear that nothing has been commented upon the merits of the case.

The OA is disposed of accordingly.

Miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, also stand disposed of.

There is no order as to costs.