Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2026) 10 CAT CK 3323

Ras Bihari Rai vs Director General Sankhiyiki Bhawan & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad · Decided on 8 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajnish Kumar Rai, Member (J)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No.678 of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 128 words

Ms. Shrishti Singh along with Mr. Gaurav Gautam, learned counsel for the applicant, and Mr. Chakrapani Vatsyayan, learned counsel for the respondents, are present and heard.

2.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the Original Application has been filed seeking medical reimbursement, which was duly considered by the respondents during the pendency of the Original Application and the amount in question has since been paid to the applicant. Accordingly, she submits that the Original Application is not being pressed.

3.

Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the same.

4.

In view of the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Original Application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

5.

All pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, stand disposed of.