High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 08 JH CK 0043

Ramesh Prasad Mahto & Others vs State Of Jharkhand & Others

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 19 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 6054 of 2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 175 words

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J

The matter has been heard through video conferencing with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. They have no complaint about any

audio and visual connectivity.

Mr. R.S.Mazumdar, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, has pressed the writ petition.

Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Dhanbad Municipal Corporation, at the outset, has submitted that in view of the

repealment of the provision of Section 615(iv) of the Jharkhand Municipal Act, 2011 by way of an enactment of the year 2016, the writ petition has

become infructuous.

Mr. Sinha further submits that the aforesaid enactment would be brought on record by way of an affidavit for which he has sought for adjournment.

Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, learned senior counsel, has not objected to such submission.

In view thereof, let this matter be posted on 02.09.2021.

In the meanwhile, learned counsel for the respondent Dhanbad Municipal Corporation shall bring on record the amendment made in Section 615(4) of

the Jharkhand Municipal Act, 2011 by way of an affidavit.