High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 08 PAT CK 2350

Rajiv Kumar vs The State Of Bihar & Ors.

Patna High Court · Decided on 13 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7507 of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 384 words
1.

The present Writ petition is filed for the following reliefs:-

“(i)

For quashing the final selection list issued under the signature of respondent nos. 2 to 4 by which the name of respondent no.6 be recommended for grant of PDS license in Domuhan Panchayat, Banka although petitioner is the first Impanel candidate in the provisional merit list.

(ii)

For directing respondent no. 3 to consider a fresh in terms of Provisional Merit List and issued License in favour of the petitioner in Domuhan Panchayat.”

2.

At this juncture, the Learned counsel for the respondents contended that Rule 5(iv) of Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 give ample opportunity to prefer a complaint before the Divisional Commissioner. For better appreciation of the case, Rule 5(iv) is incorporated:-

“Rule 5(iv)- Any aggrieved applicant against the recommendation embodied in the publication of the final merit list may file a complaint before the Divisional Commissioner within 15 days mentioning clear reasons with the evidences. The Divisional Commissioner will dispose vacancy-wise complaints. All complaints will be disposed of within a maximum period of 30 days from the date of its receipt.”

3.

Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in the Writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under the provisions of Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016.

4.

The remedy available under the Act is to be availed at the first instance, before approaching the Court. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to file a complaint/application before the Divisional Commissioner. However, the limitation period for filing such complaint has been lapsed.

5.

Taking into consideration that the petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing complaint/application, the Writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file complaint/application within one month from the date of receipt of this order before the concerned authority. The delay in filing the complaint/application shall liberally be condoned by the Divisional Commissioner as the Writ petition was filed in the year 2019 itself. Further, the Divisional Commissioner shall dispose of the complaint, through a reasoned speaking order in accordance with law within three months from the date of filing of the complaint.

6.

With the above said observation, the Writ petition is disposed of.

7.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.