High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 03 PAT CK 0035

Rajiv Kumar Ranjan S/o Shri Jaynath Prasad Yadav vs Sangita Kumari, S/o Sri Govind Prasad Yadav

Patna High Court · Decided on 16 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Chakradhari Sharan
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
5 of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 164 words
1.

Heard the parties.

2.

The present application, under Section 19(4) of the

Family Court''s Act, has been preferred against the order, dated

07.10.2015, passed in Maintenance Case No. 183(M) of 2012, by

the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna,

whereby, he has allowed the interim maintenance @ Rs. 5,000/- per

month in favour of opposite party No. 2 and Rs. 2,000/- per month

in favour of opposite party No. 3.

3.

The present application cannot be maintained in view

of interim nature of the order.

4.

Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the

petitioner, has, however, submitted that the petitioner intends to go

for one time settlement.

5.

The petitioner shall have the liberty to take this plea

before the Court of learned Additional Principal Judge, Family

Court, Patna, in connected Maintenance Case No. 183(M) of 2012.

6.

If petitioner does so, the Court shall pass necessary

orders in accordance with law.

7.

With the aforesaid liberty, this application stands

disposed of.