High CourtsDivision Bench(1995) 06 AP CK 0004

Rajini Enterprises vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Andhra Pradesh High Court · Decided on 28 June 1995 · Citation: (2003) 133 STC 262

HON’BLE JUDGES
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J · G. Bikshapathy, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Special Appeal No''s. 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 36 of 1995

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 241 words
1.

The point raised in these eight appeals is whether the petitioners are entitled to the benefit of reduced rate of tax prescribed in entry 24(b) of the Act.

2.

Though the assessing authority held that the petitioner is not entitled to the reduced rate of tax, the Appellate Deputy Commissioner accepted the plea of the petitioners and granted the benefit of rate specified in entry 24(b) of the First Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act. In exercise of the power u/s 20 of the Act, the Commissioner revised the orders of the Appellate Deputy Commissioner.; Of the eight cases, four arise under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act and four arise under the Central Sales Tax Act.

3.

Inasmuch as the point raised in these cases is covered by a Division Bench of this Court to which one of us (Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.) was a member, which held in T.R.C. No. 176 of 1987 on January 31, 1995, State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Jananti Oil Mills Private Ltd., ) that the benefit of reduced rate of tax could be available only when the raw material was groundnut only but not otherwise and accordingly laid down that entry 24(b) could not be availed in cases of solvent groundnut oil extracted from the groundnut-cake.

4.

We have to hold that there is no illegality in the orders impugned in these appeals. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.