Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 12 NCLAT CK 0429

Rajesh Monga & Ors. vs Konduru Prasanth Raju

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, CHENNAI Bench · Decided on 2 December 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Venugopal, Member (Judicial) · Naresh Salecha, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT)(CH)(Ins) No.421/2022 & IA Nos.1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041 & 1042/2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 138 words

ORDER

02.12.2022: The Learned Counsel Mr. Rakesh Kumar appearing for the ‘Appellants’ seeks permission from this ‘Tribunal’ to withdraw the instant Comp. App. (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.421/2022. Acceding to his said request, the instant Comp. App. (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.421/2022 is ‘dismissed’ as ‘withdrawn’. The connected IA No.1037/2022 (for ‘Exemption’), IA No.1038/2022 (for ‘Delay in Filing’), IA No.1039/2022 (For ‘Seeking Leave’), IA/1040/2022 (For ‘Exemption), IA/1041/2022 (For ‘Stay’) and IA/1042/2022 (For ‘Condonation of Delay’) are Closed.

Before parting with the ‘Case’, this ‘Tribunal’ makes it, lucidly, clear that the ‘withdrawal’ of the instant Comp. App. (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.421/2022 will not ‘preclude’ the ‘Appellants’ to seek an ‘appropriate remedy’, before the ‘Competent Authority’ / ‘Forum’ for redressal, of their ‘grievances’, of course, in the manner ‘known to Law’ and ‘in accordance with Law’, if they, so desire / advised.