Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2020) 11 CAT CK 2669

Raja Ram Meena vs Ministry Of Railways & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi · Decided on 6 November 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
A. K. Bishnoi, Member (A) · R.N. Singh, Member (J)
CASE NUMBER
O.A. No.1748/2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 390 words

Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (J):

2.

Heard.

3.

In the present Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant is aggrieved of his non-appointment under the respondents under LARSGESS Scheme in spite of the fact that his claim has already been considered prior to 27.10.2017.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the entire consideration process for such appointment had been completed by the respondents before 27.10.2017. However, the respondents have failed and neglected to issue an offer of appointment to the applicant and aggrieved of the same, the applicant has preferred representations to the respondents on 12.06.2019 (Annexure A-7) and 20.12.2019 (Annexure A-8).

5.

It is further added by learned counsel for the applicant that the respondents were required to consider the claim of the applicant keeping in view their own policy decisions dated 28.9.2018 (Annexure A-4), 5.3.2019 (Annexure A-5) and 26.2.2020 (Annexure A-9). However, till date the claim/representation of the applicant has not been considered by the respondents.

6.

Issue notice.

7.

Shri Krishan Kant Sharma, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents, accepts notice.

8.

At this stage, Shri Manjeet Singh Reen, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant will be satisfied if OA is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the applicant as made in his representations 12.06.2019 (Annexure A-7) and 20.12.2019 (Annexure A-8) and to decide the same keeping in view the letters/circulars of the respondents – Railways, referred to hereinabove, in a time bound manner. To such request of the learned counsel for the applicant, there is no objection from the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

9.

In view of the aforesaid, without going into the merit, the present OA is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority under the respondents to consider the representations of the applicant 12.06.2019 (Annexure A-7) and 20.12.2019 (Annexure A-8) keeping in view their own letters/circulars and dispose of the same by passing an appropriate reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within 10 weeks of receipt of a certified copy of this Order.

10.

The OA is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. However, in the facts and circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs.

Pending MA, if any, also stands disposed of.