High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 04 MAD CK 0156

Raja vs Inspector Of Police

Madras High Court · Decided on 17 April 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
B.Pugalendhi, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (MD) No. 5913 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 556 words

B.Pugalendhi, J

1.

The respondent police registered a case as against this petitioner in Crime No.314 of 2024 for the offence under Sections 379 of IPC r/w 21(4) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulations) Act, 1957, and remanded him into judicial custody on 06.04.2024. Therefore, the petitioner has filed this petition seeking bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has illegally transported 3 bags of river sand in his two wheeler.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not indulged in such criminal activities and he is languishing in jail from 06.04.2024. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent opposed to grant bail on the ground that the petitioner has illegally transported 3 bags of river sand. No previous case is pending against the petitioner.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of mineral involved in this case and no previous case is pending, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on the following conditions:-

i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Papanasam, Thanjavur District;

ii) The petitioner and the sureties shall submit a copy of their Aadhaar Card or any other identity card issued by the Government in proof of their residence address;

iii) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for the interrogation;

iv) The petitioner shall not misuse the liberty granted to him by indulging in any further offence and shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses. The petitioner shall be available for the trial as well.

v) On violation of any of the above conditions by the petitioner, the respondent police shall move an application for cancellation of the bail.

7.It is needless to say that any tool or instrument or vehicle used for illegal quarrying/ transportation of sand is liable to be seized under Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act and any vehicle or instrument or tool which has been seized under Section 21 (4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation)Act is liable to be confiscated under Section 21(4-A) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation)Act

8.Though the above provision mandates the authorities to confiscate the tool or instrument or vehicle involved in the commission of the offence of illegal quarrying / transportation of sand, the authorities have not invoked the provision of 21 (4-A) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation)Act 1957 and therefore, a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.19936 of 2016, etc., batch has emphasised the need for confiscation of the vehicles. Consequently, the Government has also issued certain directions to the authorities of Revenue, Police and Forest and Geology and Mining departments to seize the vehicles and for confiscation of the same in G.O.Ms.No.170, Industries MMC-2 Department, dated 05.08.2020 and therefore, the respondent police is directed to proceed further as per Section 21 (4-A) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act and as per the guide lines issued in G.O.Ms.No.170, Industries MMC-2 Department, dated 05.08.2020.