High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 04 MAD CK 0054

Kanthaiya vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 4 April 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
B.Pugalendhi, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition No. 5201 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 552 words

B.Pugalendhi, J

1.

The respondent police registered a case as against this petitioner in Crime No.201 of 2024 for the offence under Section 379 IPC and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and remanded him into judicial custody on 21.03.2024. Therefore, the petitioner has filed this petition seeking bail.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused has illegally transported one unit of river sand in a lorry bearing Reg.No.TN59BK1554.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, he is languishing in Jail from 21.03.2024.

4.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent opposes for grant of bail on the ground that the investigation is yet to be completed.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, quantity of the mineral and also considering the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6.

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail

i) on the petitioner executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kulithalai.

ii) The petitioner and the sureties shall submit a copy of their Aadhaar Card or any other identity card issued by the Government in proof of their residence address;

iii) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. He has to co-operate for the investigation.

iv) The petitioner shall not misuse the liberty granted to him by indulging in any further offence and shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses. He shall be available for the trial as well.

v) On violation of any of the above conditions by the petitioner, the respondent police shall move an application for cancellation of the bail.

7.

It is needless to say that any tool or instrument or vehicle used for illegal quarrying / transportation of sand is liable to be seized under Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals(Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and any vehicle or instrument or tool which has been seized under Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, is liable to be confiscated under Section 21(4-A) of the Act.

8.

Though the above provision mandates the authorities to confiscate the tool or instrument or vehicle involved in the commission of the offence of illegal quarrying / transportation of sand, the authorities have not invoked the provision under Section 21(4-A) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and therefore, a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.19936 of 2016, etc., batch has emphasized the need for confiscation of the vehicles. Consequently, the Government has also issued certain directions to the authorities of Revenue, Police and Forest and Geology and Mining departments to seize the vehicles and for confiscation of the same in G.O.Ms.No.170, Industries (MMC-II) Department, dated 05.08.2020. Therefore, the respondent police is directed to proceed further as per Section 21 (4-A) of the Mines and Minerals(Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and as per the guidelines issued in G.O.Ms.No.170, Industries (MMC-II) Department, dated 05.08.2020.