High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 09 TP CK 0024

Raj Kumar Das vs State Of Tripura & 3 Ors

Tripura High Court · Decided on 11 September 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arindam Lodh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) 569 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 172 words

Arindam Lodh, J

Heard Mr. Somik Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Sarma, learned Additional GA appearing for the respondents-State.

By way of filing the instant writ petition, the petitioner only has prayed for completing the departmental proceeding initiated against him in the year 2020.

Mr. Somik Deb, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that though 3 years have been elapsed over from the date of initiation of the departmental proceeding, but, it has not been completed till today.

Mr. D. Sarma, learned Additional GA appearing for the respondents-State has submitted that a direction may be given to the respondents to complete the departmental proceeding within a period of one year from today.

Considering the submission of learned counsel appearing for the parties, I direct the respondents/competent authority to complete the departmental proceeding initiated against the petitioner within a period of 6 (six) months from today.

Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.