High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 01 DEL CK 1148

Rahul Jindal vs The State Trading Corporation Of India Limited

Delhi High Court · Decided on 18 January 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyoti Singh, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 17237/2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 178 words

JYOTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)

1.

Present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the Respondent Corporation to pay gratuity to the Petitioner in accordance with the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and reliance is placed on the judgment of the Madras High Court in W.P. No. 2135/1987 titled as Mettur Beardsell Ltd. (represented by Its Personnel Manager), Madras v. Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) (Authority under Payment of Gratuity Act), Madras & Others decided on 12.06.1996 and judgment of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in W.P.(C) No. 13911/2012 (L) titled as Sreeja. B v. The Regional Joint Labour Commissioner decided on 05.03.2015.

2.

In view of the provisions of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, the relief sought by the Petitioner lies before the Controlling Authority under the said Act and the writ petition is not maintainable at this stage.

3.

In view of the alternative statutory remedy, writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the Petitioner to approach the Appropriate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 in accordance with law.