Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 04 NCLAT CK 0724

R. Ramachandran vs Mahindra World City Developers Ltd. & Anr.

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, CHENNAI Bench · Decided on 18 April 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Venugopal, Member (Judicial) · Shreesha Merla, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 56/2023 (IA Nos. 197, 198, 237/2023)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 297 words

ORDER

A ‘Memo’, dated 17/04/2023, is projected on the side of the ‘Appellant’, inter alia, stating that all the disputes were supplied with the ‘1st Respondent’, by the ‘Appellant’, subject to the terms and conditions, therein, under the ‘Memo of Compromise’ and hence a ‘Prayer’ is made, on behalf of the ‘Appellant’, for setting aside the ‘Impugned Order’, dated 13/02/2023, passed by the ‘Adjudicating Authority’/ ‘National Company Law Tribunal, Division Bench – II, Chennai’, in C.P.(IB)/146(CHE)/2022.

To the aforesaid ‘Memo’, preferred by the ‘Appellant’, dated 17/04/2023, the Learned Counsel for the ‘Respondent’, Mr. Mayan Jain, has made an endorsement in ‘Open Court’, ‘Today’, representing the Respondent’s side, that the ‘Respondent’, has ‘No Objection’, for the present ‘Memo’, to be taken ‘on record’, and, for setting aside the ‘Impugned Order’, in terms of the ‘Memorandum of Compromise’, arrived between the Parties.

Be that as it may, in view of the fact that the ‘settlement’ has been arrived at, between the Parties and in terms of the ‘Memo’, that all disputes between them were settled, subject to the terms and conditions, there in, under the ‘Memo of Compromise’, dated 17/04/2023, this ‘Tribunal’, recording the said fact, ‘Allows’ the ‘Appeal’, by setting aside, the ‘Impugned Order’, in terms of the ‘Memorandum of Compromise’, and the ‘Order’ dated 13/02/2023, in C.P.(IB)/146(CHE)/2022, before the ‘Adjudicating Authority’/ ‘National Company Law Tribunal, Division Bench–II, Chennai’, is set aside and the main C.P. (IB)/146(CHE)/2022, is ‘Dismissed’. ‘No Costs’. Connected pending I.A. Nos. 197, 198, 237 of 2023, are ‘Closed’.

It is open for the ‘Adjudicating Authority’/ ‘National Company Law Tribunal, Division Bench – II, Chennai’, to determine the fees of ‘Interim Resolution Professional’, upon any ‘Application’/ ‘Petition’, being moved by the ‘Interim Resolution Professional’, as per ‘Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016’ and in ‘IBBI Regulations’.