Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 08 NCLAT CK 0991

Mohankumar Singapura Jayanna vs Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. & Anr.

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, CHENNAI Bench · Decided on 3 August 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Venugopal, Member (Judicial) · Shreesha Merla, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT)(CH)(Ins) No.248/2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 384 words

ORDER

A Joint Application in IA No.791 of 2023 in Comp. App. (AT)(CH)(Ins) No.248 of 2023 is projected before this ‘Tribunal’ [filed under Rule 31 and Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules, 2016], inter alia, stating that the parties had settled their ‘Disputes’, and in the process of implementing the ‘Settlement’. Furthermore, with a view to facilitate the execution and implementation of ‘Settlement’, the parties pray jointly before this ‘Tribunal’, to set aside the ‘Impugned Order’ dated 23.06.2023 in CP(IB) No.99/BB/2022, before the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ [National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench] and withdraw the same.

2)

When a query is posed by this ‘Tribunal’, to the Learned Counsels appearing for the respective parties in respect of ‘Settlement’, as to whether parties had accepted the ‘Settlement’ wholeheartedly on their own ‘free will and volition’ they informed this ‘Tribunal’ that in reality, the ‘parties’ had settled their ‘Disputes’ among themselves and with a view to facilitate the execution of implementation of settlement, they pray for setting aside the ‘Impugned Order’ in question.

3)

This ‘Tribunal’, in the teeth of IA/791/2023 in Comp. App. (AT)(CH)(Ins) No.248 of 2023 is filed ‘jointly by the respective parties’, wherein they have categorically and in ‘unequivocal term’, had apprised this ‘Tribunal’, about the ‘Disputes’ between them got settled. Viewed in that perspective, they have prayed for setting aside of ‘Impugned Order’, dated 23.06.2023 in CP(IB) No.99/BB/2022 on the file of the ‘Adjudicating Authority’/‘Tribunal’ and to withdraw the said Company Petition. This ‘Tribunal’ recording the said fact (which is not disputed on either side), allows the ‘instant Appeal’ (AT)(CH)(Ins) No. 248 of 2023, on the file of the ‘Appellate Tribunal’ and sets-aside the ‘Impugned Order’ dated 23.06.2023 in CP(IB) No.99/BB/2022 passed by the ‘Adjudicating Authority’, [National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench]. As a logical corollary, the main CP(IB) No.99/BB/2022, on the file of the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ [National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench] is dismissed. No costs. Connected IAs’ No. 792 & 793/2023 are closed.

Before parting with the case, ‘Liberty’ is granted to the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ (‘National Company Law Tribunal’ Bengaluru Bench), to decide the ‘Fees’ of the ‘Interim Resolution Professional’, of course, upon an ‘Application’/‘Petition’ being filed by the ‘Interim Resolution Professional’, as per the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and in conformity with the IBBI Regulation, as the case may be.