Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2016) 09 SC CK 0010

R. Priyadarshini vs Superintendent of Police

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 5 September 2016 · Citation: (2017) 2 RecentApexJudgments(RAJ) 707

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jagdish Singh Khehar and Arun Mishra, JJ.
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) ..... CRLMP No. 13526 of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 189 words

SLP(Crl.).../2016 (Crl. MP No. 13526/2016)

The petitioner is permitted to file the instant special leave petition.

2.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, we are of the view, that the impugned order passed by the High Court calls for no interference whatsoever. It is however necessary for us to observe, that the investigation ordered by the High Court shall be conducted independently by the CB CID, North Zone, uninfluenced by any of the observations recorded by the High Court.

3.

Disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

SLP(Crl.).../2016 (Crl. MP No. 14465/2016)

4.

The petitioner is permitted to file the instant special leave petition.

5.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, we are of the view, that the impugned order passed by the High Court calls for no interference whatsoever. It is however necessary for us to observe, that the District Registrar(Administration), Chennai North, while adjudicating upon the show cause notice to Pastor John Amulraj, as to why his marriage licence should not be cancelled, shall take an independent decision, uninfluenced by any of the observations recorded by the High Court.

6.

Disposed of in the aforesaid terms.