High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 01 JH CK 0051

Quadir Khan @ Kadir Khan & Ors vs The State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 5 January 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anant Bijay Singh
CASE NUMBER
1679 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 362 words
1.

It appears that under order dated 12.12.2017 appellants namely, Quadir Khan @ Kadir Khan, Sunny Khan, Pappu Khan, Afzal Khan and

Tansif Khan @ Mithu @ Tansif @ Mitthu Khan were admitted on bail. The prayer for bail of the appellants namely, Belal Khan, Shamshad Khan,

Irshad Khan and Naushad Khan was dismissed as not pressed.

2.

It further appears that due to inadvertence, the name of appellant No.9 Tansif Khan @ Mithu @ Tansif @ Mitthu Khan, who was admitted on

bail has been wrongly typed among the appellants whose prayer for bail was dismissed as not pressed.

3.

Further I.A. No. 9853 of 2017 has been filed for modification of order dated 12.12.2017 passed in cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 1679 of 2017 to the

extent of the order passed in I.A. No. 7558 of 2017 related with this appellant namely, Tasnif Khan @ Mithu @ Tasnif @ Mitthu Khan as he was

allowed bail by the same order.

4.

Order dated 12.12.2017 passed in I.A. No. 7558 of 2017 and I.A. No. 7554 of 2017 in Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 1679 of 2017 is modified to

the extent that the sentence of the appellant No.9, namely, Tansif Khan @ Mithu @ Tansif @ Mitthu Khan is suspended during pendency of the

appeal and he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of the court of Sri Sanjay Kumar No.1, learned Additional Sessions Judge-VIII, Dhanbad or his successor court in

connection with Sessions Trial No. 342 of 2011, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be close relative of the appellants. It is

ordered that the appellant No.9 Tansif Khan @ Mithu @ Tansif @ Mitthu Khan will report in the last week of every month before the office

Incharge, Jorapokhar Police Station and if the Officer-in-charge, Jorapokhar, police station find that the appellant is involved in other criminal

activities, the officer-incharge, will report the same to the learned A.P.P so that appropriate order be passed.

5.

Accordingly, I.A. No. 9853 of 2017 stands disposed of.