High CourtsSingle Bench(2001) 06 GUJ CK 0001

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. vs Workers Represented thro'' Gujarat Kamgar Panchayat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 19 June 2001

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.R. Tripathi, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Special Civil Application No''s. 4350 of 2000 and 12758 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 283 words

Ravi R. Tripathi, J.—The present petition is filed by Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. and Pepsi Cola India Marketing Co. Ltd. - petitioners, challenging the order dated 7th March, 2000 passed by the Industrial Tribunal below Exh. 33 (Exh. 43) in Reference (IT) No. 232/1998, whereby the documents produced with Exh.33 at Serial Nos. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 were ordered not to be taken on record and the application was rejected.

2.

Mr. Buch, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the order below Exh. 33 was passed by the Honourable Industrial Tribunal mainly on the ground that the petitioners herein had objected to the application (Exh. 16) filed by the respondent-Union for impleading the workers of Clearing and Forwarding Agents as parties to the said Reference.

3.

The respondent-Union has filed Special Civil Application No. 12758 of 2000 challenging the order passed by the Industrial Tribunal dated 22/11/1999 below Exh. 16 in Reference (IT) No. 232/1998. The Union has also prayed for directing the Honourable Tribunal to implead Gujarat Cold Storage and Natvar Trading Company as parties to the Reference, being I.T. No. 232/1998.

4.

After hearing both the parties and taking into consideration the contents of both the petitions, both the petitions are allowed. The Honourable Industrial Tribunal is directed to implead Gujarat Cold Storage and Natvar Trading Company as parties to the Reference, being I.T. No. 232/1998. Similarly, the order passed below Exh. 33 (Exh. 43) in Reference (IT) No. 232/1998 is also quashed and set aside and the documents mentioned at Serial Nos. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 in Exh.33 are ordered to be exhibited. Rule is made absolute.