High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 12 J&K CK 0004

Parveena Bano and Another vs State of J&K and Others

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 2 December 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Kumar Gupta
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
1974 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

30 paragraphs · 645 words
1.

Petitioners claim to be major and, as such, contend to have out of their own free will entered into marital tie which fact is supported by the copy

of marriage agreement dated 07.10.2017, and Nikah Nama dated 01.11.2017, the photocopies of which have been placed on record. It is further

contended that the respondents against the law of the land are trying to cause interference in the peaceful married life of the petitioners and are also

trying to implicate them in the cooked up cases.

2.

The documents reflecting the marriage of the petitioners are on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also placed on record Date of

Birth Certificate, issued by the Principal, Government Hr. Sec. School, Lone Hari, Kupwara of petitioner no.1, which shows her date of birth as

10.12.18895; in this way petitioner no. 1 was major at the time of solemnization of marriage.

3.

It is stated that despite having married each other out of their free will and consent, the private respondents through the agency of police are

trying to harass them and get them framed in false cases.

4.

In similar circumstances where parties had entered into wedlock of their own free will and volition, the Hon''ble Supreme Court in Lata Singh v.

State of UP and anr, AIR 2006 SC 2522 has held as under:

14.

This case reveals a shocking state of affairs. There is no dispute that the petitioner is a major and was at all relevant times a

major. Hence she is free to marry anyone she likes or live with anyone she likes. There is no bar to an inter-caste marriage under the

Hindu Marriage Act or any other law. Hence, we cannot see what offence was committed by the petitioner, her husband or her

husband''s relatives.......................................................

17.

The caste system is a curse on the nation and the sooner it is destroyed the better. In fact, it is dividing the nation at a time when

we have to be united to face the challenges before the nation unitedly. Hence, inter-caste marriages are in fact in the national interest

as they will result in destroying the caste system. However, disturbing news are coming from several parts of the country that young

men and women who undergo inter-caste marriage, are threatened with violence, or violence is actually committed on them. In our

opinion, such acts of violence or threats or harassment are wholly illegal and those who commit them must be severely punished. This

is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes. If the parents of

the boy or girl do not approve of such inter caste or inter religious marriage the maximum they can do is that they can cut off social

relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate acts of violence and cannot harass the

person who undergoes such inter caste or inter-religious marriage. We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities

throughout the country will see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter religious marriage with a

woman or man who is a major, the couple are not harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence, anyone who

gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal

proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law.

5.

In view of the above, this petition is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction that the official respondents shall ensure the protection of life and

liberty of the petitioners and shall take appropriate steps strictly in accordance with the ratio of the judgment (supra).