Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2020) 08 CAT CK 0012

Parshuram Singh And Others vs Union Public Service Commission And Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 7 August 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, J · Mohd. Jamshed, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application.No. 100, 990, 993 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 390 words

L Narasimha Reddy, J

1.

Common positions of facts and law arise in these OAs. Hence they are disposed of through a common order.

2.

The first applicant in the first OA is working as Assistant Director (Physics) and the one, in the second OA is working as Assistant Director (Chemistry) in Forensic Science Laboratory, in the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD). The next promotion is to the post of Deputy Director of Forensic Science Laboratory.

3.

The grievance of the applicants is that respondents are not convening the DPC, though the vacancies are existing and they are qualified. It is stated that correspondence is ensuing to the fact that on account of their being shown as accused in a criminal case, they need not be considered for promotion. In this background the applicants filed this OA with a prayer to direct the UPSC to convene DPC, for selection to the post of Deputy Director by considering the eligible Assistant Directors as on 01.09.2017, and to quash any of the documents which tend to disqualify the applicants.

4.

Heard Sh. Varun Mudgil, learned counsel for applicants and Sh. R.V.Sinha, learned counsel for the UPSC and Ms. Esha Mazumdar, learned counsel for respondents.

5.

The applicants no doubt, are working as Assistant Directors in Forensic Science Laboratory and they have also acquired eligibility to be promoted to the post of Deputy Directors. However, that itself is not sufficient for the purpose of promotion. The Appointing Authority has to take a decision for convening the DPC, and as and when the DPC is convened, the names of eligible candidates are to be considered. The question as to whether the applicants suffer from any ineligibility or disqualification for being considered for promotion, would arise only when the DPC is convened. No observations can be made much less finding can be given, as to the eligibility of the applicants for promotion, at this stage.

6.

We, therefore, dispose of the OA directing that as and when the respondents convene the DPC for promotion to the post of Assistant Director, Forensic Science Laboratory, the names of the eligible candidates shall be considered. In case the applicants are excluded from consideration, the reasons there for, shall be communicated to them, at the relevant time.

7.

There shall be no order as to costs.