High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 12 MEG CK 0031

Paras Nath Gupta vs Union Of India & Ors

Meghalaya High Court · Decided on 14 December 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
W. Diengdoh, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 37 Of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 189 words

W. Diengdoh, J

Heard learned CGC who has submitted that some factual instructions has been received from the department, information which are relevant for consideration of the dispute between the parties herein and as such, it is prayed that the same may be allowed to be filed by way of an affidavit.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently objected to the same on the grounds that this matter has travelled since the year 2016 and at this point of time to introduce new facts and documents may not be tenable.

This Court on consideration of the submissions made would reiterate that in a dispute to be adjudicated between the parties, a level playing field has to be given to the parties with a fair chance for the parties to place their best arguments before the court. Accordingly, on this premise, the prayer of the learned CGC is allowed.

However, it is made clear that the said affidavit has to be filed on the next date fixed failing which the matter shall proceed without affording any more opportunity to the respondent.

As prayed for, list this matter on 31.01.2023.