High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 03 P&H CK 0156

Pankaj Sharma vs State of Haryana and others,

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 24 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Tewari
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
21077 of 2016 (O&M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 245 words

C.M No.4525 of 2017

1.

This is an application for placing on record the document

(Annexure P-13), and for interim direction.

2.

Counsel for contesting respondent No.3 states that he has no

objection if this application is allowed.

3.

Consequently, this application is allowed and the document is

taken on record.

CWP No.21077 of 2016

4.

This writ petition has been filed seeking mandamus to the

respondents to issue appointment letter to the petitioner on the post of

System Officer on the basis of selection list prepared in response to

advertisement No.1/2010, category No.15.

5.

Learned counsel for respondent No.3 states that the petitioner

was called on 3.3.2017 with the original documents. Counsel for the

petitioner accepts that and states that the petitioner appeared on 3.3.2017.

6.

It cannot be lost sight of that the petitioner was selected as far

back as 2013 and till date no final decision has been taken. Since the

petitioner had appeared before the respondents on 3.3.2017, the respondents

already have had a period of three weeks to consider the documents

submitted by the petitioner. In the circumstances, the respondents are

directed to take a final decision regarding the appointment of the petitioner

on or before 31.3.2017, and in case the petitioner is found entitled to it,

issue appointment letter to him on or before that date.

7.

This petition stands disposed of.

8.

Since the main case has been decided, the pending C.Ms, if

any, also stand disposed of.