High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 01 JH CK 0124

Mustafizullah vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 11 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 10728 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 366 words

Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the

stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.179 of 2020 registered under sections

341/323/376(2)/448/313/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 6 & 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed rape upon the informant for

eight years on the pretext of marriage but did not marry her and caused her miscarriage without her consent. It is further submitted that the allegations

against the petitioner are all false and the informant is a major lady and there is an unexplained delay of about 10 years in lodging the F.I.R. It is then

submitted that the petitioner and the informant are neighbours and the allegation itself indicates that this is a case of consensual sexual relationship

between the parties. It is further submitted that this case has been falsely foisted to blackmail the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has

been in custody since 06.11.2020 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 23 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes

to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above named petitioner on bail. Accordingly,

the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, POCSO Act, Hazaribagh, in connection with Barkagaon

P.S. Case No.179 of 2020 with the condition that he will cooperate with the trial of the case.