High CourtsDivision Bench(2001) 11 PAT CK 0070

Muso Singh @ Muso Pd. Singh vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 28 November 2001 · Citation: (2002) 1 PLJR 300

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravi S. Dhavan, C.J · Shashank Kumar Singh, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
C.W.J.C. No. 15231 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 193 words
1.

The admitted fact on the present petition is that the Petitioner is running a saw-mill. In these circumstances, the Petitioner has been saddled with commercial rent.

2.

The contention of the Petitioner is that the provisions of the Bihar Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1993 be declared as ultravires. The basis for this submission is that the amendment which has been made to the Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 cannot be reconciled. The question whether it can be reconciled will depend upon the facts and circumstances, on his own-showing the demand which has been made from the Petitioner, reference paragraph 2(e) of the petition is from 1993-94 to 2001 to 2002.

3.

In the circumstances, merely by making a statement would not render the Act ultravires. Then, sufficient material is not before the court that notice be issued for declaring the Act as ultravires. Of the assessment which has been caused on a show cause notice to the Petitioner, clearly an appeal is provided under Sub-section (5) of Section 23 of the Act and the Petitioner may take recourse to this alternate remedy provided an appeal is filed within 30 days from today.

4.

Dismissed.