High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 05 J&K CK 0023

Mushtaq Ahmad Bhat vs State of J&K & Ors.

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 4 May 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ramalingam Sudhakar
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
2817 of 2015 MP No 01 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 202 words
1.

Short grievance of the petitioner is that he has been appointed as Class IV in the respondent department under SRO 43 of 1994, along with

other persons in District, Kupwara, but the designation of the post against which the petitioner has been appointed has not been identified by the

respondents. Accordingly to the petitioner, respondents have issued the tentative seniority list dated 18.12.2015, enlisting some of the class iv

employees on pick and choose basis and have also initiated process for their promotions.

2.

Mr. Majid Aftab Wani, learned AAG states that the claim of the petitioner have been considered and orders in this respect stands already

issued. Statement of Mr. M. A. Wani, learned AAG is taken on record.

3.

In this view of the matter, keeping the writ petition on board will not serve any purpose. Accordingly, same is admitted to hearing and is

disposed of with a direction to the respondents to convey the order, if any taken in the matter to the petitioner within three weeks from the date of

receipt of this order. Petitioner is at liberty agitate the matter in case he is aggrieved.

4.

The Writ petition is disposed of along with connected MPs.