Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 09 ITAT CK 6624

Mukhtar Ahmed vs DCIT, Circle 61(1), Delhi

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 7 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mahavir Singh, Vice President · M Balaganesh, Accountant Member
CASE NUMBER
ITA 892/DEL/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 251 words

PER SHRI M BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1.

The appeal in ITA No.892/Del/2026 for AY 2019-20, arises out of the order of the Id National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as 'Id. CIT(A)', in short] dated 06.01.2026 against the order of assessment passed u/s 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') dated 30.03.2025 by the Assessing Officer, ACIT, Circle61(1), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'Id. AO').

2.

The preliminary issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the Learned NFAC was justified in passing an exparte order in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.

3.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. Further, on going through the grounds raised by the assessee and the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), we find that the ld NFAC had decided the issue ex parte without adjudicating the issue on merits giving its independent finding. Hence, in the interest of justice and fairplay we deem it fit and appropriate to restore this appeal to file of ld NFAC for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. Needless to mention the assessee be given reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is directed to cooperate with ld NFAC for expeditious disposal of the appeal by not taking unwarranted adjournments. Hence, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.