Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 05 ITAT CK 3141

Shri Ombeer Singh vs ITO

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 13 May 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Balaganesh, Accountant Member · Anubhav Sharma, Judicial Member
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 27/Del/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 257 words

O R D E R

PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.:

1.

The appeal in ITA No.27/Del/2026 for AY 2012-13, arises out of the order of the ld National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] dated 14.12.2024 against the order of assessment passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 20.12.2019 by the Assessing Officer, ITO, Ward-2(3)(5), Hapur (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).

2.

The preliminary issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the Learned NFAC was justified in passing an exparte order in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.

3.

We have heard the ld DR and perused the materials available on record. Further, on going through the grounds raised by the assessee and the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), we find that the ld NFAC had decided the issue ex parte without adjudicating the issue on merits giving its independent finding. Hence, in the interest of justice and fairplay we deem it fit and appropriate to restore this appeal to file of ld NFAC for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. Needless to mention the assessee be given reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is directed to cooperate with ld NFAC for expeditious disposal of the appeal by not taking unwarranted adjournments. Hence, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.