High CourtsDivision Bench(2008) 07 PAT CK 0175

Mukesh Kumar Agrawal vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 11 July 2008 · Citation: (2009) 1 PLJR 257

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.M. Lodha, C.J · Barin Ghosh, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
LPA No. 516 of 2008

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 188 words
1.

We heard the counsel for the parties. The appeal suffers from delay of 59 days. For condonation thereof, I.A. No. 3979 of 2008 has been made. Even if we condone the delay for the reasons set out in the application, we are satisfied that the Letters Patent Appeal has no merit and does not deserve to be admitted.

2.

Two facts are not disputed, namely (i) that an order of suspension was passed against the appellant on 16.10.2007, and (ii) that charge-sheet has been framed on 29.2.2008. It is true that charge-sheet has not been framed within 90 days, but, at the same time, the aforesaid date would show that it has been framed within the extended period permissible under Rule 9 of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005.

3.

In this backdrop of facts, the order of the Division Bench in the case of Chandra Shekhar Prasad vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. (LPA No. 37 of 2008) is not applicable.

4.

Letters Patent Appeal has no merit. It is dismissed in limine. This disposes of I.A. No. 3979 of 2008.